Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
ITAT dismissed Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of CIT(A) in toto. The Tribunal affirmed deletion of addition u/s 68 r/w s.115BBE on alleged unexplained sundry creditors, holding that only opening balances were involved and no fresh credit arose in the relevant previous year. Disallowance of GST expenditure was sustained as allowable business outgo, the liability having crystallized during the year when input tax credit had lapsed. On alleged bogus purchases, ITAT endorsed CIT(A)'s restriction of addition to a nominal gross profit rate, as books were audited, not rejected, and sales and stock records were accepted. Deletion of addition on alleged difference in purchases was also confirmed, the AO having miscompared net and gross figures.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.