Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Office memorandum clarifies the procedure when a taxpayer's MAP application under Rule 44G is successfully resolved while an income tax appeal is pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Following mutual agreement, the taxpayer must accept or reject the resolution and provide proof of appeal withdrawal. Since no explicit process existed for withdrawal at the CIT(A) stage, the memorandum directs CIT(A) offices to issue an intimation confirming acceptance of withdrawal of the appeal or specific grounds covered by the MAP resolution. This intimation will constitute valid proof of withdrawal for purposes of Rule 44G(8).
Office memorandum clarifies the procedure when a taxpayer's MAP application under Rule 44G is successfully resolved while an income tax appeal is pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). Following mutual agreement, the taxpayer must accept or reject the resolution and provide proof of appeal withdrawal. Since no explicit process existed for withdrawal at the CIT(A) stage, the memorandum directs CIT(A) offices to issue an intimation confirming acceptance of withdrawal of the appeal or specific grounds covered by the MAP resolution. This intimation will constitute valid proof of withdrawal for purposes of Rule 44G(8).
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
