Opportunity to furnish unsecured-loan confirmations is required before reassessment initiation; proceedings require fresh consideration after taxpayer...
Under-reporting on a first reassessment return attracts penalty, while enhanced misreporting penalty requires proof of a statutory misreporting catego...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting additions made u/s 69C and 68. In respect of purchases from the alleged accommodation entry provider, the Tribunal held that the assessee had produced purchase invoices, e-way bills, transport documents, ledger extracts and bank statements evidencing payment through banking channels, and the AO brought no contrary material except a CGST report; the purchases were found to be actually used in manufacturing. For unsecured loans from five creditors, the assessee had filed ITRs, confirmations and bank statements, with no defects identified by AO or CIT(A). Consequently, the CIT(A)'s order was set aside.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting additions made u/s 69C and 68. In respect of purchases from the alleged accommodation entry provider, the Tribunal held that the assessee had produced purchase invoices, e-way bills, transport documents, ledger extracts and bank statements evidencing payment through banking channels, and the AO brought no contrary material except a CGST report; the purchases were found to be actually used in manufacturing. For unsecured loans from five creditors, the assessee had filed ITRs, confirmations and bank statements, with no defects identified by AO or CIT(A). Consequently, the CIT(A)'s order was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
