Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting additions made u/s 69C and 68. In respect of purchases from the alleged accommodation entry provider, the Tribunal held that the assessee had produced purchase invoices, e-way bills, transport documents, ledger extracts and bank statements evidencing payment through banking channels, and the AO brought no contrary material except a CGST report; the purchases were found to be actually used in manufacturing. For unsecured loans from five creditors, the assessee had filed ITRs, confirmations and bank statements, with no defects identified by AO or CIT(A). Consequently, the CIT(A)'s order was set aside.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting additions made u/s 69C and 68. In respect of purchases from the alleged accommodation entry provider, the Tribunal held that the assessee had produced purchase invoices, e-way bills, transport documents, ledger extracts and bank statements evidencing payment through banking channels, and the AO brought no contrary material except a CGST report; the purchases were found to be actually used in manufacturing. For unsecured loans from five creditors, the assessee had filed ITRs, confirmations and bank statements, with no defects identified by AO or CIT(A). Consequently, the CIT(A)'s order was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
