Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
ITAT held that reassessment u/s 147 was invalid as no addition was made on the very issue forming the recorded reasons, the assessee being treated instead as an accommodation entry provider with estimated commission income. Following binding HC precedent, the Tribunal ruled that additions on issues different from the recorded reasons could not be sustained, thereby allowing all six appeals on this primary ground. Additionally, on the alternative merits, ITAT directed that commission income be restricted to 0.50% on outstanding loan liabilities and 0.40% on sale-purchase transactions, and that intra-group transactions be excluded while computing commission income, granting partial relief in estimation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.