Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT dismissed the appeal, upholding denial of CENVAT credit and consequential demand and penalties. The appellant, a manufacturer of TMT bars without an induction furnace, had claimed credit on melting scrap imported and dealt with only on paper, which was not its input at the relevant time. The Tribunal held that Rule 9 does not permit endorsement of Bills of Entry by a registered dealer and that no evidence existed of physical receipt, movement or use of the scrap in manufacture. The paper transactions, lacking sale, purchase or actual transfer of goods, rendered the appellant ineligible for CENVAT credit.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.