PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on all three issues. For expenditure on increase in authorised share capital, the Tribunal held that the disallowance arose from a capital-versus-revenue classification dispute, evidencing only a bona fide legal claim rather than concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. For foreign exchange loss, the AO's adjustment was treated as a mere timing difference due to allowance by way of depreciation, again ruling out concealment. Regarding addition based on reconciliation with Form 26AS for interest adjusted against electricity bills, ITAT held that the discrepancy was minor, arose only on reconciliation, and did not constitute concealment or inaccuracy, and therefore penalty was unsustainable.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and deleted penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on all three issues. For expenditure on increase in authorised share capital, the Tribunal held that the disallowance arose from a capital-versus-revenue classification dispute, evidencing only a bona fide legal claim rather than concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. For foreign exchange loss, the AO's adjustment was treated as a mere timing difference due to allowance by way of depreciation, again ruling out concealment. Regarding addition based on reconciliation with Form 26AS for interest adjusted against electricity bills, ITAT held that the discrepancy was minor, arose only on reconciliation, and did not constitute concealment or inaccuracy, and therefore penalty was unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.