Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A). On transfer pricing, the Tribunal followed its own decisions in the assessee's earlier assessment years, holding that no further upward adjustment was warranted in respect of the corporate guarantee fee/commission charged on guarantees provided to AEs, there being no change in facts or law. On MEIS receipts, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s treatment of such receipts as capital in nature, relying on its prior orders in the assessee's own case and aligned with SC jurisprudence, and therefore declined to interfere with the relief granted.
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A). On transfer pricing, the Tribunal followed its own decisions in the assessee's earlier assessment years, holding that no further upward adjustment was warranted in respect of the corporate guarantee fee/commission charged on guarantees provided to AEs, there being no change in facts or law. On MEIS receipts, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s treatment of such receipts as capital in nature, relying on its prior orders in the assessee's own case and aligned with SC jurisprudence, and therefore declined to interfere with the relief granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.