Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

ITAT Upholds CIT(A), Rejects Revenue Appeal on Corporate Guarantee TP Adjustment and Capital Nature of MEIS Receipts

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A). On transfer pricing, the Tribunal followed its own decisions in the assessee's earlier assessment years, holding that no further upward adjustment was warranted in respect of the corporate guarantee fee/commission charged on guarantees provided to AEs, there being no change in facts or law. On MEIS receipts, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s treatment of such receipts as capital in nature, relying on its prior orders in the assessee's own case and aligned with SC jurisprudence, and therefore declined to interfere with the relief granted.....