Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A). On transfer pricing, the Tribunal followed its own decisions in the assessee's earlier assessment years, holding that no further upward adjustment was warranted in respect of the corporate guarantee fee/commission charged on guarantees provided to AEs, there being no change in facts or law. On MEIS receipts, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s treatment of such receipts as capital in nature, relying on its prior orders in the assessee's own case and aligned with SC jurisprudence, and therefore declined to interfere with the relief granted.
The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal and upheld the order of the CIT(A). On transfer pricing, the Tribunal followed its own decisions in the assessee's earlier assessment years, holding that no further upward adjustment was warranted in respect of the corporate guarantee fee/commission charged on guarantees provided to AEs, there being no change in facts or law. On MEIS receipts, the ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s treatment of such receipts as capital in nature, relying on its prior orders in the assessee's own case and aligned with SC jurisprudence, and therefore declined to interfere with the relief granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
