PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' order setting aside confiscation of foreign-marked gold, silver bullion and currency under Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that the noticees had produced purchase invoices, accounted entries, and a Chartered Accountant's certification evidencing lawful procurement and tax-paid nature of the gold and silver. Revenue failed to discharge the burden under Section 123 or to rebut the documentary and accounting evidence with any cogent material, relying instead on suspicion and past conduct of co-accused. CESTAT held that mere suspicion cannot replace proof and found no basis to treat the seized currency as sale proceeds of smuggled bullion.
CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeals and upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)' order setting aside confiscation of foreign-marked gold, silver bullion and currency under Section 111 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal held that the noticees had produced purchase invoices, accounted entries, and a Chartered Accountant's certification evidencing lawful procurement and tax-paid nature of the gold and silver. Revenue failed to discharge the burden under Section 123 or to rebut the documentary and accounting evidence with any cogent material, relying instead on suspicion and past conduct of co-accused. CESTAT held that mere suspicion cannot replace proof and found no basis to treat the seized currency as sale proceeds of smuggled bullion.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.