Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT upheld the adjudicating authority's order dropping charges against the customs broker for alleged violation of Regulation 10(e) of CBLR, 2018. The Tribunal noted that the broker filed the Bill of Entry based on invoice, packing list and related documents duly received from and authorized by the actual importer, with all core particulars (invoice number, Bill of Lading number, quantity) tallying. The discrepancy in e-mail and phone number in the IGM was treated as secondary information, not indicative of lack of due diligence or mala fides. Finding no breach of Regulation 10(e), CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
CESTAT upheld the adjudicating authority's order dropping charges against the customs broker for alleged violation of Regulation 10(e) of CBLR, 2018. The Tribunal noted that the broker filed the Bill of Entry based on invoice, packing list and related documents duly received from and authorized by the actual importer, with all core particulars (invoice number, Bill of Lading number, quantity) tallying. The discrepancy in e-mail and phone number in the IGM was treated as secondary information, not indicative of lack of due diligence or mala fides. Finding no breach of Regulation 10(e), CESTAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
