PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
HC held that the appeals challenging interlocutory orders dated 15.11.2017 and 30.10.2017 were not maintainable and affirmed the third member's view on this limited issue. The HC expressly clarified that any observations made on merits in the order dated 26.07.2019 were only for deciding maintainability and shall not prejudice adjudication on merits. HC further held that, if the Adjudicating Authority ultimately passes a final order adverse to the appellants and they file a statutory appeal, they will be at liberty to assail the alleged denial of cross-examination and recall of witnesses in respect of the said interlocutory orders. The Tribunal, in such future appeal, must consider these grounds uninfluenced by earlier observations. Adjudication proceedings are to resume without further delay. Both appeals were disposed of.
HC held that the appeals challenging interlocutory orders dated 15.11.2017 and 30.10.2017 were not maintainable and affirmed the third member's view on this limited issue. The HC expressly clarified that any observations made on merits in the order dated 26.07.2019 were only for deciding maintainability and shall not prejudice adjudication on merits. HC further held that, if the Adjudicating Authority ultimately passes a final order adverse to the appellants and they file a statutory appeal, they will be at liberty to assail the alleged denial of cross-examination and recall of witnesses in respect of the said interlocutory orders. The Tribunal, in such future appeal, must consider these grounds uninfluenced by earlier observations. Adjudication proceedings are to resume without further delay. Both appeals were disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.