Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
ITAT dismissed the assessee's challenge to the transfer of jurisdiction u/s 127, holding that participation in assessment without timely objection u/s 124(3) precluded such plea. ITAT upheld the estimation of gross profit at 35% for AYs 2005-06 and 2006-07 as reasonable, based on the assessee's own past results and telescoping already granted. For AY 2007-08, ITAT rejected further GP addition, holding no basis for enhancement post-search. Additions towards alleged unaccounted initial investment in stock, unexplained investment in immovable property, unaccounted stock (gold and major part of silver), unexplained cash/advances u/ss 69A/69C, loose papers (including "Roop Sangam"), and gold transactions with a third party were all deleted for lack of corroborative evidence and to avoid double taxation. Overall, Revenue's multiple additions were largely disallowed, save for sustained GP estimation for specified years.
ITAT dismissed the assessee's challenge to the transfer of jurisdiction u/s 127, holding that participation in assessment without timely objection u/s 124(3) precluded such plea. ITAT upheld the estimation of gross profit at 35% for AYs 2005-06 and 2006-07 as reasonable, based on the assessee's own past results and telescoping already granted. For AY 2007-08, ITAT rejected further GP addition, holding no basis for enhancement post-search. Additions towards alleged unaccounted initial investment in stock, unexplained investment in immovable property, unaccounted stock (gold and major part of silver), unexplained cash/advances u/ss 69A/69C, loose papers (including "Roop Sangam"), and gold transactions with a third party were all deleted for lack of corroborative evidence and to avoid double taxation. Overall, Revenue's multiple additions were largely disallowed, save for sustained GP estimation for specified years.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
