Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Jurisdiction objection barred by s124(3); s127 transfer upheld, most s69A/69C additions deleted, GP estimation partly sustained

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT dismissed the assessee's challenge to the transfer of jurisdiction u/s 127, holding that participation in assessment without timely objection u/s 124(3) precluded such plea. ITAT upheld the estimation of gross profit at 35% for AYs 2005-06 and 2006-07 as reasonable, based on the assessee's own past results and telescoping already granted. For AY 2007-08, ITAT rejected further GP addition, holding no basis for enhancement post-search. Additions towards alleged unaccounted initial investment in stock, unexplained investment in immovable property, unaccounted stock (gold and major part of silver), unexplained cash/advances u/ss 69A/69C, loose papers (including "Roop Sangam"), and gold transactions with a third party were all deleted for l.........