PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that employees of the State Power Corporation are not "Government employees" or employees of a qualifying Government undertaking for purposes of s.10(10AA)/10(10A) IT Act. Accordingly, exemption on leave encashment is not available for the period of service rendered under the Corporation. However, ITAT found that the predecessor State Electricity Board constituted an undertaking of the State Government falling within s.10(10AA)/10(10A). Since A1 had rendered qualifying service with the Board from 18.11.1983 to 16.04.2010 and was subsequently compulsorily transferred to the Corporation under a restructuring scheme, denial of exemption for the portion relatable to Board service would defeat the beneficial object of the provision. ITAT therefore upheld relief for leave encashment of Rs.13,02,816 relatable to the Board service, while confirming taxability of the balance relatable to service with the Corporation.
ITAT held that employees of the State Power Corporation are not "Government employees" or employees of a qualifying Government undertaking for purposes of s.10(10AA)/10(10A) IT Act. Accordingly, exemption on leave encashment is not available for the period of service rendered under the Corporation. However, ITAT found that the predecessor State Electricity Board constituted an undertaking of the State Government falling within s.10(10AA)/10(10A). Since A1 had rendered qualifying service with the Board from 18.11.1983 to 16.04.2010 and was subsequently compulsorily transferred to the Corporation under a restructuring scheme, denial of exemption for the portion relatable to Board service would defeat the beneficial object of the provision. ITAT therefore upheld relief for leave encashment of Rs.13,02,816 relatable to the Board service, while confirming taxability of the balance relatable to service with the Corporation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
