Transfer-pricing aggregation of distinct support-service and subcontract transactions was rejected, while debt-free receivables attracted no notional ...
Customs exemptions cover photovoltaic assembly machinery and PVF backsheets, while fully declared cleared imports may avoid confiscation and penalties...
Specific tariff classification for LCD devices overrides treatment as electricity-meter parts, defeating differential duty, extended limitation, and p...
Stayed disciplinary punishment does not establish unfitness for insolvency professional registration; reconsideration must disregard mere pendency of ...
Indirect corporate control can create related-party status, excluding financial creditors from Committee of Creditors representation, participation an...
Page of 4881
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
101 to 120 of 97618 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the first appellate authority erred in dismissing the appeal under s. 249(4)(b) on the ground that no return of income was filed and no tax was deposited. ITAT observed that, in the absence of any established advance tax liability and where the assessee asserts no taxable income, non-filing of return does not trigger the precondition of tax payment for maintainability of appeal. The ex parte assessment having been framed u/s 144 without effective hearing, ITAT restored the entire matter to the file of the AO for de novo consideration. The AO has been directed to examine the assessee's explanations and evidence regarding the impugned cash transactions and pass a fresh speaking order after affording due opportunity of hearing.
ITAT held that the first appellate authority erred in dismissing the appeal under s. 249(4)(b) on the ground that no return of income was filed and no tax was deposited. ITAT observed that, in the absence of any established advance tax liability and where the assessee asserts no taxable income, non-filing of return does not trigger the precondition of tax payment for maintainability of appeal. The ex parte assessment having been framed u/s 144 without effective hearing, ITAT restored the entire matter to the file of the AO for de novo consideration. The AO has been directed to examine the assessee's explanations and evidence regarding the impugned cash transactions and pass a fresh speaking order after affording due opportunity of hearing.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.