Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT held that the first appellate authority erred in dismissing the appeal under s. 249(4)(b) on the ground that no return of income was filed and no tax was deposited. ITAT observed that, in the absence of any established advance tax liability and where the assessee asserts no taxable income, non-filing of return does not trigger the precondition of tax payment for maintainability of appeal. The ex parte assessment having been framed u/s 144 without effective hearing, ITAT restored the entire matter to the file of the AO for de novo consideration. The AO has been directed to examine the assessee's explanations and evidence regarding the impugned cash transactions and pass a fresh speaking order after affording due opportunity of hearing.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
