Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed the appeal of Assessee X, deleting the addition made as unexplained money u/s 69A. The ITAT held that the cash deposits in the bank account represented business turnover already offered to tax under the presumptive scheme u/s 44AD, where maintenance of books is not mandatory and cash transactions are normal. It found that the AO and CIT(A) erred in treating the deposits as unexplained solely on the basis of bank credits, without considering corresponding withdrawals and the income already subjected to tax under the return filed u/s 44AD. Since legitimate tax had been paid on the turnover, no further tax liability survived. Consequently, the impugned addition u/s 69A was deleted and the ground of Assessee X was allowed.
ITAT allowed the appeal of Assessee X, deleting the addition made as unexplained money u/s 69A. The ITAT held that the cash deposits in the bank account represented business turnover already offered to tax under the presumptive scheme u/s 44AD, where maintenance of books is not mandatory and cash transactions are normal. It found that the AO and CIT(A) erred in treating the deposits as unexplained solely on the basis of bank credits, without considering corresponding withdrawals and the income already subjected to tax under the return filed u/s 44AD. Since legitimate tax had been paid on the turnover, no further tax liability survived. Consequently, the impugned addition u/s 69A was deleted and the ground of Assessee X was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
