PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order refusing access to the first set of valuation reports to the suspended management of the corporate debtor. The Tribunal held the resolution professional acted within the statutory scheme of Section 24 of the IBC and CIRP Regulation 35(2): voting and full member rights of CoC are distinct from participative status of suspended directors, and confidential valuation material need not be furnished to persons bereft of voting rights. The RP's omission to circulate two valuers' reports with the earlier notice was attributable to their receipt on the meeting date, not wilful non-compliance, and the Appellant was permitted to participate in non-confidential agenda items. No interference was warranted; appeal dismissed.
The NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the impugned order refusing access to the first set of valuation reports to the suspended management of the corporate debtor. The Tribunal held the resolution professional acted within the statutory scheme of Section 24 of the IBC and CIRP Regulation 35(2): voting and full member rights of CoC are distinct from participative status of suspended directors, and confidential valuation material need not be furnished to persons bereft of voting rights. The RP's omission to circulate two valuers' reports with the earlier notice was attributable to their receipt on the meeting date, not wilful non-compliance, and the Appellant was permitted to participate in non-confidential agenda items. No interference was warranted; appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.