PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
AT partly allowed the appeal and directed the respondent to permit inspection and production of investigatory material to the appellant to the extent necessary to test the charges. The respondent must provide the chats between the appellant and any entity, copies of statements of fund managers, documents seized from the appellant's desk, the daily register maintained by the asset manager, and the appellant's trade logs and the Big Client's trade details limited to scrip, quantum and time of order placement. Entire third-party chats may be withheld to protect privacy. The respondent's reliance on call data records was rejected and the appellant is entitled to his call details. No direction is given concerning production of a Section 65B certificate.
AT partly allowed the appeal and directed the respondent to permit inspection and production of investigatory material to the appellant to the extent necessary to test the charges. The respondent must provide the chats between the appellant and any entity, copies of statements of fund managers, documents seized from the appellant's desk, the daily register maintained by the asset manager, and the appellant's trade logs and the Big Client's trade details limited to scrip, quantum and time of order placement. Entire third-party chats may be withheld to protect privacy. The respondent's reliance on call data records was rejected and the appellant is entitled to his call details. No direction is given concerning production of a Section 65B certificate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.