PMLA anticipatory bail requires satisfaction of twin conditions, while predicate-offence protection does not extend to independent money-laundering pr...
School-affiliation charges remain taxable where not directly connected with examinations, while extended limitation requires proof of deliberate tax e...
Concessional penalty for search-disclosed unreconciled jewellery applies where substantive disclosure conditions are met despite omission from origina...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the 25.08.2009 Deed of Guarantee was a continuing, irrevocable guarantee binding the guarantor for subsequent renewals and variations under its express clauses; consequently the guarantor remained liable for obligations arising after variations. The tribunal rejected the appellant's contention that resignation from directorship or selective clause reading discharged the guarantee, and found no procedural prejudice in consideration of the Additional Report. Debt and default under the guarantee were established and initiation of CIRP against the appellant was affirmed, subject to limitation of the appellant's liability to Rs. 3.84 crore as stipulated in the 2009 Deed; appeal disposed.
NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the 25.08.2009 Deed of Guarantee was a continuing, irrevocable guarantee binding the guarantor for subsequent renewals and variations under its express clauses; consequently the guarantor remained liable for obligations arising after variations. The tribunal rejected the appellant's contention that resignation from directorship or selective clause reading discharged the guarantee, and found no procedural prejudice in consideration of the Additional Report. Debt and default under the guarantee were established and initiation of CIRP against the appellant was affirmed, subject to limitation of the appellant's liability to Rs. 3.84 crore as stipulated in the 2009 Deed; appeal disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.