Blocked input tax credit for resort construction remains unavailable; interest follows actual utilisation, while delayed payment attracts statutory pe...
Duplicate PAN allocation requires record verification and deactivation reasons before assessment-related transactions can be attributed to an assessee...
Faceless assessment safeguards require requested personal hearings and adequate final show-cause response time, failing which reassessment is required...
The HC quashed and set aside the assessment orders dated 28.02.2025 and held that for assessment periods prior to 15.10.2020 the pre-condition of service of notice in Form GST DRC-01A under Rule 142(1A) is mandatory; consequently an assessment made without such notice is invalid. The matter is remitted to the assessing authority to initiate fresh assessment proceedings after issuance of notice in Form GST DRC-01A and to pass consequential orders only after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The petition is allowed; parties are anonymized as petitioner and assessing authority/respondents for all ensuing proceedings.
The HC quashed and set aside the assessment orders dated 28.02.2025 and held that for assessment periods prior to 15.10.2020 the pre-condition of service of notice in Form GST DRC-01A under Rule 142(1A) is mandatory; consequently an assessment made without such notice is invalid. The matter is remitted to the assessing authority to initiate fresh assessment proceedings after issuance of notice in Form GST DRC-01A and to pass consequential orders only after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing. The petition is allowed; parties are anonymized as petitioner and assessing authority/respondents for all ensuing proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
