Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT upholds that the impugned addition under assessment proceedings is unsustainable. The assessee demonstrated that the disputed receipts arose from GST invoices dated 12.4.2018 and 12.5.2018, declared in GSTR-1 and reflected in an updated Form 26AS, with corresponding tax deducted at source by the payer in FY 2017-18 (AY 2018-19). The Tribunal finds the receipts were correctly offered to tax in AY 2019-20, are revenue-neutral vis-Ã -vis matching TDS, and do not pertain to the assessment year under challenge. Consequently the addition is deleted and the assessee's appeal against the AO's assessment is allowed.
ITAT upholds that the impugned addition under assessment proceedings is unsustainable. The assessee demonstrated that the disputed receipts arose from GST invoices dated 12.4.2018 and 12.5.2018, declared in GSTR-1 and reflected in an updated Form 26AS, with corresponding tax deducted at source by the payer in FY 2017-18 (AY 2018-19). The Tribunal finds the receipts were correctly offered to tax in AY 2019-20, are revenue-neutral vis-Ã -vis matching TDS, and do not pertain to the assessment year under challenge. Consequently the addition is deleted and the assessee's appeal against the AO's assessment is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
