Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT upholds that the impugned addition under assessment proceedings is unsustainable. The assessee demonstrated that the disputed receipts arose from GST invoices dated 12.4.2018 and 12.5.2018, declared in GSTR-1 and reflected in an updated Form 26AS, with corresponding tax deducted at source by the payer in FY 2017-18 (AY 2018-19). The Tribunal finds the receipts were correctly offered to tax in AY 2019-20, are revenue-neutral vis-Ã -vis matching TDS, and do not pertain to the assessment year under challenge. Consequently the addition is deleted and the assessee's appeal against the AO's assessment is allowed.
ITAT upholds that the impugned addition under assessment proceedings is unsustainable. The assessee demonstrated that the disputed receipts arose from GST invoices dated 12.4.2018 and 12.5.2018, declared in GSTR-1 and reflected in an updated Form 26AS, with corresponding tax deducted at source by the payer in FY 2017-18 (AY 2018-19). The Tribunal finds the receipts were correctly offered to tax in AY 2019-20, are revenue-neutral vis-Ã -vis matching TDS, and do not pertain to the assessment year under challenge. Consequently the addition is deleted and the assessee's appeal against the AO's assessment is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
