Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT upheld recovery of drawback under Rules 16 and 16A of the Drawback Rules, 1995 read with s.75 of the Customs Act, 1962, holding that recovery (with interest) was sustainable where sale proceeds were not genuinely realised from the purported buyers and remittances could not be accepted as proceeds; the Tribunal found the DRI conducted independent enquiries and issued an SCN without undue delay and that no limitation is prescribed for such recovery. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under s.114(i) and (iii). Consequentially the appeal is allowed in part: recovery with interest sustained; penalty under s.114 vacated.
CESTAT upheld recovery of drawback under Rules 16 and 16A of the Drawback Rules, 1995 read with s.75 of the Customs Act, 1962, holding that recovery (with interest) was sustainable where sale proceeds were not genuinely realised from the purported buyers and remittances could not be accepted as proceeds; the Tribunal found the DRI conducted independent enquiries and issued an SCN without undue delay and that no limitation is prescribed for such recovery. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under s.114(i) and (iii). Consequentially the appeal is allowed in part: recovery with interest sustained; penalty under s.114 vacated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
