Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT partially allowed the appeal by the Appellant. The Tribunal held that the warehousing period for the goods expired after 20.03.2020 and, in light of the national limitation extension during the COVID period, the prescribed warehousing period must be adjusted accordingly; consequently the Appellant's claim for remission of customs duty and interest in respect of the balance warehoused goods under s.23, Customs Act, 1962, is sustained and the denial in the impugned order set aside. The levy of duty under s.72(1)(d) is mitigated by remission for the specified goods. A general penalty under s.117 was confirmed but reduced in the interest of justice to Rs.25,000. Appeal allowed in part.
CESTAT partially allowed the appeal by the Appellant. The Tribunal held that the warehousing period for the goods expired after 20.03.2020 and, in light of the national limitation extension during the COVID period, the prescribed warehousing period must be adjusted accordingly; consequently the Appellant's claim for remission of customs duty and interest in respect of the balance warehoused goods under s.23, Customs Act, 1962, is sustained and the denial in the impugned order set aside. The levy of duty under s.72(1)(d) is mitigated by remission for the specified goods. A general penalty under s.117 was confirmed but reduced in the interest of justice to Rs.25,000. Appeal allowed in part.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
