Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT held the appeal not maintainable and dismissed it; the appellant's challenge to confiscation of undeclared foreign-origin gold seized from personal baggage during arrival was unsuited to this Tribunal because the matter involves baggage seizure arising from alleged smuggling and concealment without declaration under the Customs Act. The Tribunal found an alternative remedial route exists and that an appeal from the Commissioner (Appeals) order in a baggage seizure case could not be entertained before CESTAT. Consequently the impugned appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, and the appellant is directed to pursue any available remedy before the appropriate forum, if such remedy remains open.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
