Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC quashed the impugned orders dated 08.07.2025 and 30.07.2025 issued by Respondent 1 for failure to afford an effective opportunity of hearing and for contravening applicable CBDT instructions; the matter is remitted to Respondent 1 for fresh consideration. Respondent 1 is directed to entertain and decide the petitioner's stay application dated 07.07.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within two weeks of uploading of the web copy of this order. The consequential notice dated 08.09.2025 is quashed and the attachment of the petitioner's bank account is ordered to be lifted forthwith; respondents are restrained from undertaking coercive recovery measures in respect of the assessment year.
The HC quashed the impugned orders dated 08.07.2025 and 30.07.2025 issued by Respondent 1 for failure to afford an effective opportunity of hearing and for contravening applicable CBDT instructions; the matter is remitted to Respondent 1 for fresh consideration. Respondent 1 is directed to entertain and decide the petitioner's stay application dated 07.07.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within two weeks of uploading of the web copy of this order. The consequential notice dated 08.09.2025 is quashed and the attachment of the petitioner's bank account is ordered to be lifted forthwith; respondents are restrained from undertaking coercive recovery measures in respect of the assessment year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.