Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC quashed the Public Notice issued by the first respondent dated 12.02.2021 and allowed the petition. The court held the Notice conflicted with applicable customs guidance by treating local tax recovery inconsistently, and mischaracterised levy responsibilities: IGST paid on import is distinct from GST payable under the CGST regime on a subsequent auction sale. Upon transfer of title at auction the purchaser ceases to be an importer, and collection of GST on the bid price falls within GST law, not the issuing authority's competence. As the Notice contravened the statutory scheme governing customs and GST and was issued without jurisdiction, it was declared wholly without authority and set aside.
HC quashed the Public Notice issued by the first respondent dated 12.02.2021 and allowed the petition. The court held the Notice conflicted with applicable customs guidance by treating local tax recovery inconsistently, and mischaracterised levy responsibilities: IGST paid on import is distinct from GST payable under the CGST regime on a subsequent auction sale. Upon transfer of title at auction the purchaser ceases to be an importer, and collection of GST on the bid price falls within GST law, not the issuing authority's competence. As the Notice contravened the statutory scheme governing customs and GST and was issued without jurisdiction, it was declared wholly without authority and set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.