Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC held the revocation/penalty proceeding against the petitioner time-barred and quashed, directing that Regulation 17(1) CBLR, 2018 requires initiation within 90 days from receipt of an official offence report; the 2018 Regulations expressly define 'offence report,' which must emanate from an official source and need not follow any particular format. The respondent/licensing authority bore the burden to prove when its office received the offence report or prohibitory order but failed to do so and did not identify the triggering offence report or produce supporting material. Consequently the impugned proceeding was barred by limitation and the writ petition was allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
