TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC dismissed all three appeals, holding that no proprietary right vested in the Purchaser in Liquidation under Section 54 because the Agreement to Sell stipulated full payment within 12 months and conditional transfer rights; permission to take bookings did not amount to a transferable right. The vendor validly terminated the ATS pursuant to its terms and is entitled to forfeit 20% of the sale consideration. The vendor must be afforded an opportunity to prove actual damages, particularly arising from the Purchaser's default in payments to the Authority, aggregate dues exceeding Rs.25 crores. The Court declined to adjudicate disputed monetary claims absent evidence and noted the Purchaser had not instituted a suit triable under Section 446(2).
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
