Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
ITAT affirms that a revised return filed within the due date which first elects the concessional regime under s.115BAA substitutes the original return and validly constitutes the s.115BAA election; the AO's characterization of such filing as a prohibited "withdrawal" is rejected. Consequent to acceptance of s.115BAA for AY 2021-22, the assessee is ineligible to claim MAT credit for that year; the AO is directed to verify any MAT credit claimed. While s.115BAA(2) bars set-off of losses attributable to specified deductions, the tribunal accepts the appellate factual finding that the assessee's brought-forward business and capital losses are not so barred and allows their set-off, upholding the CIT(A) conclusions.
ITAT affirms that a revised return filed within the due date which first elects the concessional regime under s.115BAA substitutes the original return and validly constitutes the s.115BAA election; the AO's characterization of such filing as a prohibited "withdrawal" is rejected. Consequent to acceptance of s.115BAA for AY 2021-22, the assessee is ineligible to claim MAT credit for that year; the AO is directed to verify any MAT credit claimed. While s.115BAA(2) bars set-off of losses attributable to specified deductions, the tribunal accepts the appellate factual finding that the assessee's brought-forward business and capital losses are not so barred and allows their set-off, upholding the CIT(A) conclusions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
