Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT affirms that a revised return filed within the due date which first elects the concessional regime under s.115BAA substitutes the original return and validly constitutes the s.115BAA election; the AO's characterization of such filing as a prohibited "withdrawal" is rejected. Consequent to acceptance of s.115BAA for AY 2021-22, the assessee is ineligible to claim MAT credit for that year; the AO is directed to verify any MAT credit claimed. While s.115BAA(2) bars set-off of losses attributable to specified deductions, the tribunal accepts the appellate factual finding that the assessee's brought-forward business and capital losses are not so barred and allows their set-off, upholding the CIT(A) conclusions.
ITAT affirms that a revised return filed within the due date which first elects the concessional regime under s.115BAA substitutes the original return and validly constitutes the s.115BAA election; the AO's characterization of such filing as a prohibited "withdrawal" is rejected. Consequent to acceptance of s.115BAA for AY 2021-22, the assessee is ineligible to claim MAT credit for that year; the AO is directed to verify any MAT credit claimed. While s.115BAA(2) bars set-off of losses attributable to specified deductions, the tribunal accepts the appellate factual finding that the assessee's brought-forward business and capital losses are not so barred and allows their set-off, upholding the CIT(A) conclusions.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
