Disciplinary proportionality requires penalties for Authorised Representative misconduct to match proven harm, leading to reconsideration of registrat...
Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s allowance of the assessee's claim for deduction under s.80IA(4) in respect of income from container freight stations, dismissing the revenue's appeals for AY 2018-19 and 2020-21. The Tribunal held that the AO's disallowance was untenable where no distinguishing facts for the year under consideration were recorded and the issue had been previously adjudicated in the assessee's favor by a coordinate bench. In view of the CBDT clarification on the scope of s.80IA(4) and the binding ratio in the assessee's earlier proceedings, the ITAT declined to interfere with the appellate authority's order and dismissed the revenue's appeals.
The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)'s allowance of the assessee's claim for deduction under s.80IA(4) in respect of income from container freight stations, dismissing the revenue's appeals for AY 2018-19 and 2020-21. The Tribunal held that the AO's disallowance was untenable where no distinguishing facts for the year under consideration were recorded and the issue had been previously adjudicated in the assessee's favor by a coordinate bench. In view of the CBDT clarification on the scope of s.80IA(4) and the binding ratio in the assessee's earlier proceedings, the ITAT declined to interfere with the appellate authority's order and dismissed the revenue's appeals.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4918 
