<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee allowed deduction under s.80IA(4) for container freight station income; revenue appeals dismissed for AY 2018-19, 2020-21</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93383</link>
    <description>The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s allowance of the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under s.80IA(4) in respect of income from container freight stations, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2018-19 and 2020-21. The Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s disallowance was untenable where no distinguishing facts for the year under consideration were recorded and the issue had been previously adjudicated in the assessee&#039;s favor by a coordinate bench. In view of the CBDT clarification on the scope of s.80IA(4) and the binding ratio in the assessee&#039;s earlier proceedings, the ITAT declined to interfere with the appellate authority&#039;s order and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=858825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee allowed deduction under s.80IA(4) for container freight station income; revenue appeals dismissed for AY 2018-19, 2020-21</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93383</link>
      <description>The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s allowance of the assessee&#039;s claim for deduction under s.80IA(4) in respect of income from container freight stations, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeals for AY 2018-19 and 2020-21. The Tribunal held that the AO&#039;s disallowance was untenable where no distinguishing facts for the year under consideration were recorded and the issue had been previously adjudicated in the assessee&#039;s favor by a coordinate bench. In view of the CBDT clarification on the scope of s.80IA(4) and the binding ratio in the assessee&#039;s earlier proceedings, the ITAT declined to interfere with the appellate authority&#039;s order and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 08:30:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93383</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>