Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The CESTAT allowed the appeals and set aside the impugned order insofar as it adjudged confiscation and directed recovery of duty foregone. The Tribunal held that once the licensing authority's records reflect discharge of export obligation, the Customs Department lacks jurisdiction to initiate recovery or confiscation on the basis of purported breach or stock-keeping assumptions unless the licensing authority has annulled the licence or recorded misrepresentation. Consequently the confiscation, ancillary penalties and demands for duties foregone were declared without legal basis and quashed, and any consequential recovery proceedings were remitted or directed to be withdrawn.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
