Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the adjudicating order that directed recovery of differential customs duty with interest and imposition of penalties. The Tribunal held that valuation for additional duty under s.3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act must conform to customs valuation rules and that re-determination based on post-import list prices was impermissible. The importer cannot be held liable for post-import alteration or re-affixation of retail selling prices by downstream parties; such adjustments, if any, pertain to excise jurisdiction under the Central Excise Act and Standards of Weights and Measures Act. The adjudicating authority exceeded its powers under the Customs Act; recovery and penalty directions were quashed.
CESTAT allowed the appeal and set aside the adjudicating order that directed recovery of differential customs duty with interest and imposition of penalties. The Tribunal held that valuation for additional duty under s.3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act must conform to customs valuation rules and that re-determination based on post-import list prices was impermissible. The importer cannot be held liable for post-import alteration or re-affixation of retail selling prices by downstream parties; such adjustments, if any, pertain to excise jurisdiction under the Central Excise Act and Standards of Weights and Measures Act. The adjudicating authority exceeded its powers under the Customs Act; recovery and penalty directions were quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
