Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside an impugned appellate order dated 28 September 2024 for breach of natural justice, holding that the appellant was not afforded an opportunity to be heard and was unable to adduce documents or have pleaded grounds of appeal considered. The HC remanded the matter to the State-Tax Additional Commissioner (Appeal), Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka, directing a de novo adjudication after affording the parties a full and fair hearing and considering materials produced. The HC emphasized that quasi-judicial authorities must observe principles of fairness and provide hearing where decisions may cause civil consequences. Petition disposed of by remand.
The HC set aside an impugned appellate order dated 28 September 2024 for breach of natural justice, holding that the appellant was not afforded an opportunity to be heard and was unable to adduce documents or have pleaded grounds of appeal considered. The HC remanded the matter to the State-Tax Additional Commissioner (Appeal), Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka, directing a de novo adjudication after affording the parties a full and fair hearing and considering materials produced. The HC emphasized that quasi-judicial authorities must observe principles of fairness and provide hearing where decisions may cause civil consequences. Petition disposed of by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
