Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1 to 20 of 95872 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC set aside an impugned appellate order dated 28 September 2024 for breach of natural justice, holding that the appellant was not afforded an opportunity to be heard and was unable to adduce documents or have pleaded grounds of appeal considered. The HC remanded the matter to the State-Tax Additional Commissioner (Appeal), Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka, directing a de novo adjudication after affording the parties a full and fair hearing and considering materials produced. The HC emphasized that quasi-judicial authorities must observe principles of fairness and provide hearing where decisions may cause civil consequences. Petition disposed of by remand.
The HC set aside an impugned appellate order dated 28 September 2024 for breach of natural justice, holding that the appellant was not afforded an opportunity to be heard and was unable to adduce documents or have pleaded grounds of appeal considered. The HC remanded the matter to the State-Tax Additional Commissioner (Appeal), Santhal Pargana Division, Dumka, directing a de novo adjudication after affording the parties a full and fair hearing and considering materials produced. The HC emphasized that quasi-judicial authorities must observe principles of fairness and provide hearing where decisions may cause civil consequences. Petition disposed of by remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
