Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
ITAT modified the order of the Ld. CIT(A), holding that discrepancies in a third-party GST return cannot alone sustain an addition under s. 69C. The Tribunal found admitted purchases of Rs. 30,42,821 (not Rs. 76,10,580) and concluded the Assessing Officer's estimate was excessive. ITAT directed the AO to compute unexplained income by applying a gross profit rate of 5% on the admitted total purchases, thereby reducing the addition previously upheld by the CIT(A). The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and remitted for assessment in accordance with this direction.
ITAT modified the order of the Ld. CIT(A), holding that discrepancies in a third-party GST return cannot alone sustain an addition under s. 69C. The Tribunal found admitted purchases of Rs. 30,42,821 (not Rs. 76,10,580) and concluded the Assessing Officer's estimate was excessive. ITAT directed the AO to compute unexplained income by applying a gross profit rate of 5% on the admitted total purchases, thereby reducing the addition previously upheld by the CIT(A). The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and remitted for assessment in accordance with this direction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4915 
