Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT modified the order of the Ld. CIT(A), holding that discrepancies in a third-party GST return cannot alone sustain an addition under s. 69C. The Tribunal found admitted purchases of Rs. 30,42,821 (not Rs. 76,10,580) and concluded the Assessing Officer's estimate was excessive. ITAT directed the AO to compute unexplained income by applying a gross profit rate of 5% on the admitted total purchases, thereby reducing the addition previously upheld by the CIT(A). The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and remitted for assessment in accordance with this direction.
ITAT modified the order of the Ld. CIT(A), holding that discrepancies in a third-party GST return cannot alone sustain an addition under s. 69C. The Tribunal found admitted purchases of Rs. 30,42,821 (not Rs. 76,10,580) and concluded the Assessing Officer's estimate was excessive. ITAT directed the AO to compute unexplained income by applying a gross profit rate of 5% on the admitted total purchases, thereby reducing the addition previously upheld by the CIT(A). The appeal of the assessee is partly allowed and remitted for assessment in accordance with this direction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
