Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
Page of 4916
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
41 to 60 of 98302 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AT upholds the finding of contravention of Section 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) of the Act of 1973 against the appellant, holding his confessional statement-recorded after issuance of summons and not during custody-admissible and made voluntarily; co-noticee statements and documentary material corroborated involvement in hawala-style transactions. The AT declines to follow the High Court's acquittal rationale, applying the Apex Court principle that a voluntary confession in civil proceedings requires no further corroboration. The AT reduces the imposed penalty from Rs. 20,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000 in view of mitigating circumstances (including age and pre-deposit), affirms confiscation of Rs. 21,80,000, and disposes of the appeal accordingly.
The AT upholds the finding of contravention of Section 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) of the Act of 1973 against the appellant, holding his confessional statement-recorded after issuance of summons and not during custody-admissible and made voluntarily; co-noticee statements and documentary material corroborated involvement in hawala-style transactions. The AT declines to follow the High Court's acquittal rationale, applying the Apex Court principle that a voluntary confession in civil proceedings requires no further corroboration. The AT reduces the imposed penalty from Rs. 20,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000 in view of mitigating circumstances (including age and pre-deposit), affirms confiscation of Rs. 21,80,000, and disposes of the appeal accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4916 
