<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Contravention of Section 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) upheld; voluntary confessional statement admissible; penalty reduced to Rs.5,00,000, confiscation affirmed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93016</link>
    <description>The AT upholds the finding of contravention of Section 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) of the Act of 1973 against the appellant, holding his confessional statement-recorded after issuance of summons and not during custody-admissible and made voluntarily; co-noticee statements and documentary material corroborated involvement in hawala-style transactions. The AT declines to follow the High Court&#039;s acquittal rationale, applying the Apex Court principle that a voluntary confession in civil proceedings requires no further corroboration. The AT reduces the imposed penalty from Rs. 20,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000 in view of mitigating circumstances (including age and pre-deposit), affirms confiscation of Rs. 21,80,000, and disposes of the appeal accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:30:38 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:30:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Contravention of Section 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) upheld; voluntary confessional statement admissible; penalty reduced to Rs.5,00,000, confiscation affirmed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93016</link>
      <description>The AT upholds the finding of contravention of Section 9(1)(b) and 9(1)(d) of the Act of 1973 against the appellant, holding his confessional statement-recorded after issuance of summons and not during custody-admissible and made voluntarily; co-noticee statements and documentary material corroborated involvement in hawala-style transactions. The AT declines to follow the High Court&#039;s acquittal rationale, applying the Apex Court principle that a voluntary confession in civil proceedings requires no further corroboration. The AT reduces the imposed penalty from Rs. 20,00,000 to Rs. 5,00,000 in view of mitigating circumstances (including age and pre-deposit), affirms confiscation of Rs. 21,80,000, and disposes of the appeal accordingly.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 08:30:38 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>