Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The HC held that the provisional attachment effected by Ext.P2 under Section 281B has expired as the statutory six-month period lapsed without any extension, and accordingly Ext.P2 is no longer in force; the writ petition is disposed of declaring Ext.P2 invalid ab initio insofar as it continues to operate, and directing Respondents 3-5 to forthwith update land records to reflect the cessation of the attachment. The court relied on the respondents' admission that no order extending the attachment was passed and therefore granted the declaratory relief and ancillary directions to restore the property records.
The HC held that the provisional attachment effected by Ext.P2 under Section 281B has expired as the statutory six-month period lapsed without any extension, and accordingly Ext.P2 is no longer in force; the writ petition is disposed of declaring Ext.P2 invalid ab initio insofar as it continues to operate, and directing Respondents 3-5 to forthwith update land records to reflect the cessation of the attachment. The court relied on the respondents' admission that no order extending the attachment was passed and therefore granted the declaratory relief and ancillary directions to restore the property records.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.