<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Provisional attachment under Section 281B expires after six months with no extension; declared invalid ab initio, update land records</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92995</link>
    <description>The HC held that the provisional attachment effected by Ext.P2 under Section 281B has expired as the statutory six-month period lapsed without any extension, and accordingly Ext.P2 is no longer in force; the writ petition is disposed of declaring Ext.P2 invalid ab initio insofar as it continues to operate, and directing Respondents 3-5 to forthwith update land records to reflect the cessation of the attachment. The court relied on the respondents&#039; admission that no order extending the attachment was passed and therefore granted the declaratory relief and ancillary directions to restore the property records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Provisional attachment under Section 281B expires after six months with no extension; declared invalid ab initio, update land records</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92995</link>
      <description>The HC held that the provisional attachment effected by Ext.P2 under Section 281B has expired as the statutory six-month period lapsed without any extension, and accordingly Ext.P2 is no longer in force; the writ petition is disposed of declaring Ext.P2 invalid ab initio insofar as it continues to operate, and directing Respondents 3-5 to forthwith update land records to reflect the cessation of the attachment. The court relied on the respondents&#039; admission that no order extending the attachment was passed and therefore granted the declaratory relief and ancillary directions to restore the property records.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>