Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The HC directed respondents to assess and clear the goods covered by Bill of Entry No.3836297 dated 12.08.2025 without requiring a BIS registration certificate, ordering completion of the clearance process within two weeks of receipt of the order; petition dismissed as disposed. The court held that the BIS Act's mandate for compulsory standard marking and registration does not distinguish between domestic manufacturers and importers, and that the Central Government's communication seeking to exclude imports from the MSME temporal relaxation is ultra vires and cannot override the statute. The petitioner, a micro enterprise under MSME classification, is entitled to the postponement of applicability until 28.08.2025 as provided by the Order.
The HC directed respondents to assess and clear the goods covered by Bill of Entry No.3836297 dated 12.08.2025 without requiring a BIS registration certificate, ordering completion of the clearance process within two weeks of receipt of the order; petition dismissed as disposed. The court held that the BIS Act's mandate for compulsory standard marking and registration does not distinguish between domestic manufacturers and importers, and that the Central Government's communication seeking to exclude imports from the MSME temporal relaxation is ultra vires and cannot override the statute. The petitioner, a micro enterprise under MSME classification, is entitled to the postponement of applicability until 28.08.2025 as provided by the Order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
