<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>BIS registration not required for specified import; goods to be cleared within two weeks; MSME relief extended to 28.08.2025</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92986</link>
    <description>The HC directed respondents to assess and clear the goods covered by Bill of Entry No.3836297 dated 12.08.2025 without requiring a BIS registration certificate, ordering completion of the clearance process within two weeks of receipt of the order; petition dismissed as disposed. The court held that the BIS Act&#039;s mandate for compulsory standard marking and registration does not distinguish between domestic manufacturers and importers, and that the Central Government&#039;s communication seeking to exclude imports from the MSME temporal relaxation is ultra vires and cannot override the statute. The petitioner, a micro enterprise under MSME classification, is entitled to the postponement of applicability until 28.08.2025 as provided by the Order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=855659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>BIS registration not required for specified import; goods to be cleared within two weeks; MSME relief extended to 28.08.2025</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92986</link>
      <description>The HC directed respondents to assess and clear the goods covered by Bill of Entry No.3836297 dated 12.08.2025 without requiring a BIS registration certificate, ordering completion of the clearance process within two weeks of receipt of the order; petition dismissed as disposed. The court held that the BIS Act&#039;s mandate for compulsory standard marking and registration does not distinguish between domestic manufacturers and importers, and that the Central Government&#039;s communication seeking to exclude imports from the MSME temporal relaxation is ultra vires and cannot override the statute. The petitioner, a micro enterprise under MSME classification, is entitled to the postponement of applicability until 28.08.2025 as provided by the Order.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2025 09:07:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=92986</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>