Form 26AS evidence requires successor-entity accounting verification after business transfer, while invoice-supported related-party advertising expend...
Money-laundering judgment timing requires awaiting the scheduled-offence decision despite continuation of the underlying trial where outcomes directly...
Accredited investor eligibility expands through securities-market exposure, while alternative investment fund disputes require prescribed resolution a...
The HC directed respondents to assess and clear the goods covered by Bill of Entry No.3836297 dated 12.08.2025 without requiring a BIS registration certificate, ordering completion of the clearance process within two weeks of receipt of the order; petition dismissed as disposed. The court held that the BIS Act's mandate for compulsory standard marking and registration does not distinguish between domestic manufacturers and importers, and that the Central Government's communication seeking to exclude imports from the MSME temporal relaxation is ultra vires and cannot override the statute. The petitioner, a micro enterprise under MSME classification, is entitled to the postponement of applicability until 28.08.2025 as provided by the Order.
The HC directed respondents to assess and clear the goods covered by Bill of Entry No.3836297 dated 12.08.2025 without requiring a BIS registration certificate, ordering completion of the clearance process within two weeks of receipt of the order; petition dismissed as disposed. The court held that the BIS Act's mandate for compulsory standard marking and registration does not distinguish between domestic manufacturers and importers, and that the Central Government's communication seeking to exclude imports from the MSME temporal relaxation is ultra vires and cannot override the statute. The petitioner, a micro enterprise under MSME classification, is entitled to the postponement of applicability until 28.08.2025 as provided by the Order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.