Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC observed that notifications imposing GST on specified services were declared ultra vires and that the petitioner sought refund of tax paid following finality of that declaration. The revenue refused the refund on limitation grounds, contending the limitation period commenced from the Supreme Court's order dated 19.05.2022. Noting the dispute as to the temporal commencement of limitation and the petitioner's entitlement to restitution, the HC issued notice to the respondent to answer the claim for refund, returnable 3 October 2025, thereby directing adjudication of the limitation defence and the petitioner's refund claim on the merits.
The HC observed that notifications imposing GST on specified services were declared ultra vires and that the petitioner sought refund of tax paid following finality of that declaration. The revenue refused the refund on limitation grounds, contending the limitation period commenced from the Supreme Court's order dated 19.05.2022. Noting the dispute as to the temporal commencement of limitation and the petitioner's entitlement to restitution, the HC issued notice to the respondent to answer the claim for refund, returnable 3 October 2025, thereby directing adjudication of the limitation defence and the petitioner's refund claim on the merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
